
to: FULL_NAME <EMAIL>
subject: APS General User Proposal Review Assignments for REVIEW_CYCLE Cycle
CC: Beverly Knott <bevknott@aps.anl.gov>


FULL_NAME:

It is time again to review the APS small-angle scattering proposals
for the REVIEW_CYCLE schedule cycle.  The APS is indebted to you
for your willingness and diligence in reviewing these proposals.

Here are your assigned proposals:

primary
ASSIGNED_PRIMARY_PROPOSALS

secondary
ASSIGNED_SECONDARY_PROPOSALS


(Let me know if there is a discrepancy between what is
listed above and what appears in the on-line system.)

URL: https://beam.aps.anl.gov/pls/apsweb/gup0008.panel_start_page?i_attrib=246B2411-PNL5

If you find a couple of proposals that are off your "comfort zone,"
that is my attempting to strike a balance between comfort and number of
proposals per reviewer.  Let me know if I have missed the mark completely.

This is a reminder that the next Proposal Review Panel Meeting is scheduled 
PRP_DATE.  The APS User Office will be sending
you an email describing when and where we shall meet on that day.

    (http://www.aps.anl.gov/Users/Calendars/GUP_Calendar.htm)

    
You can find a detailed description of the responsibilities
of Proposal Review Panel members at:

http://www.aps.anl.gov/user/beamtime/prp_instructions.html#responsibilities


Here is the basic template I use to help in our discussion on
the review date. Paste this in to the WWW-based review form if you
don't find it there already. If you are reviewer one, paste your 
comments above reviewer two.  As a cross-check, since we sometimes 
catch the comments pasted into the wrong proposal, replace the #### 
with the proposal number.  Then, please enter your remarks under the
appropriate reviewer.  In the course of our discussion, we'll edit to
show our final consensus and remove individual remarks.

--------------# clip here #--------------
proposal: ####  (replace ##### with the proposal number)
reviewer  # (replace # with 1 or 2)
score:    
shifts this cycle:   
total shifts:
comments: 
--------------# clip here #--------------

Please enter your reviews for the proposals on which you are either
primary or secondary reviewer into the online system.  However,
guarding against system failures, it's a great idea to email me a file with
your reviews as well.  Be sure to comment on the proposal, give a score
(1=best possible, 5=no possible relation between proposed science and
proposal, averages are typically 1.8-2.0), and also a recommended
number of shifts (both for this cycle and for the 2-year life of the proposal).

OTHER_COMMENTS

Thanks again for your participation and help in
advancing the science at the APS.

Look forward to seeing you soon,
   Pete



